PLANNING SANITY HERE |
![]() HELP US HELP YOU our work relies upon your donations and subscriptions to survive |
A DONATION TO PLANNING SANITY HERE |
Planning Sanity |
HOME PAGE |
HELPLINE 0871 750 3992 Calls 10p per minute |
OTHER
FORUMS | Legal Notice |
|
|
| The following colour scheme applies to docs on this site | Word Docs | PDF Docs | HTML Docs |
One of the most difficult areas within the law relating to village greens is the ability to enforce violations of the publics rights and other infringements, there seems to be a concerted failure of enforcement authorities to want to take appropriate action, or indeed any action, therefore few if any infringements are ever prosecuted.
The two main pieces of protective legislation comes from the Victorian era, that of Section 12 of the Enclosure Act 1857 which makes it a criminal offence to cause injury or damage or the interruption of the enjoyment of the use of the village green as a place for exercise and creation. And Section 29 of the Commons Act 1876 which relates to the encroachment onto or inclosure of a green, as well as the interference with or occupation of the soil unless it is with the aim of improving the enjoyment of the green.
So who are the policing authorities, in as far as Section 12 of the 1857 Act is concerned then action can be taken by any of the following a Church Warden, the Owner of the green, Parish, Community or District/Borough Councils. In both the above instances, legal action would be brought in the Magistrates Courts. In the case of Section 29 of the Commons Act, 1876, the process is the same as for the Inclosure Act, but an action can also be brought by any inhabitant of the Parish. The likely outcome of any successful prosecution in the Magistrates' Courts would be a fine upon the person responsible for the encroachment or works.
The owner of a green cannot do anything that interferes with the lawful recreational activities of the local inhabitants.
Many council owned greens are maintained under the provisions of the Open Spaces Act 1906 by putting in place by-laws, or alternatively by a scheme of regulations under the Commons Act 1899. There is though no obligation on private green owners to maintain greens.
Inclosure Act 1857 (Section 12): Under this section, it is a criminal offence for any person to damage any fence of a town or village green; or wilfully and without lawful authority put animals or cattle on the green; or wilfully to place any materials upon the green or do anything to interrupt the use or enjoyment of the green as a place for recreation and enjoyment. Offences are summary in nature and are tried in the Magistrates' Courts.
Commons Act, 1876 (Section 29): Under this section, encroachments or enclosures, or the placing of any structures upon town or village greens, are a public nuisance. Work carried out with a view to better enjoyment of the town or village green or recreation ground (i.e. linked to enhancing its recreational use) is not unlawful.
This section shall apply only in cases where a town or village green or recreation ground has a known and defined boundary.
How does the Rights of Way Act 2000 and the Commons Act 2006 alter the regulatory process.
Vehicular Access: Section 68 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act, 2000 permits the grant of statutory easements for vehicular access over land (including common land and village greens) where it is currently an offence to drive a vehicle, subject to certain qualifying criteria being met. Regulations now made by the Secretary of State include provisions for the grant of easements, compensation to be paid by the property owner to the landowner, dispute resolution procedures, etc. However, the Commons Act 2006 has recinded that provision, therefore it is once again be an offence to drive a vehicle onto a registered village green.
With the introduction of the 2006 Act the appropriate national authority (Secretary of State in England and National Assembly in Wales). Illustrations of an offence would be agricultural encroachment. So whilst the Magistrates will still be used for local prosecutions, it will also be possible for action to be taken by the Secretary of State. This will be by first serving a notice on the offender and land owner, and if the notice is not complied with by an application to the County Court for an order requiring compliance, we await the publication of the regulations to see exactly how this will be applied.
The process for making a complaint to te Magistrates is quite straight forward, you simply go to the Magistrates Court armed with information relating to the alleged offence, and request that a summns is issued. This in effect means that you will have to persuade a Magistrate that you have a reasonable case against the offender. If the Magistrate agrees and issues the summons, then the person alleged to have committed the offence will appear before the magistrate and you will have to prosecute (that is set out your case against the offender). Most magistrates courts have a period set aside for such aplications, in the larger courts this will be on a daily basis, with a hearing in chambers before the District Judge, in smaller courts this will often be only on one day a week and then in open court. Whilst you could in theory just turn up out of the blue and wait for a slot to go before a magistrate, it is clearly best to find out what the practice is in your local court and request an appointment.
In terms of enforcement though we still await the publications of the regulations under tthe 2006 Act we will then update this briefing with any relevant information.
Planning Sanity - August 2006 (can be freely used by local communities within their campaigns. Publication by third parties is permitted providing acknowledgment of Planning Sanity is given)
| Top of Page |