JOIN
PLANNING SANITY
HERE
Campaign for Planning Sanity - working towards a sane planning and development system for the UK
HELP US HELP YOU
our work relies upon your donations and subscriptions to survive
MAKE
A DONATION TO
PLANNING SANITY
HERE
Email
Planning
Sanity
HOME
PAGE
OTHER
FORUMS
Important
Legal
Notice
Need representation at an inquiry or a formal written presentation to your planning or village green authority.
Planning Sanity may be able to help see our representation forum for more details.

Vinyl Self Adhesive Sign SELF ADHESIVE VINYL LETTERS SIGNS AND NUMBERS
quality assured products designed just for you
sales@sew-n-print.co.uk
Visit Our Web Site
Vinyl Self Adhesive Sign
The following colour scheme applies to docs on this site Word Docs PDF Docs HTML Docs
Return to Telemast Forum

PLANNING & BROADBAND WIRELESS SYSTEMS
Law & Practice in England and Wales

This issue was missed by most commentators before it was introduced through a minor amendment to the Town and Country (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (GPDO), yet has wide implications for those concerned about the spread of mobile technology. The introduction effectively enables the entire system to be installed without any planning permission at a local level. Whilst this paper does not look at or attempt to deal with any adverse or positive health implications from the system, that is a matter for others to comment on, we are concerned that yet again close on the heels of the untried TETRA system we have another new technology being rolled out without any convincing evidence of its safety and without any precautionary consideration of the systems consequences having been taken into account.

Prior to the introduction of the new provisions if a householder wanted to put a single satellite dish on their property then they could without any permission being required from the local planning authority, unless it was in a conservation area, or was to be placed on a listed building. The new provisions remove the term satellite and replace with the more loosely defined term microwave antenna, whilst increasing the ability to place two such antenna on each residential premises, we will go into this in more detail below.

The government then looked at the question of 'Broadband Base Stations' and instead of placing them alongside mobile phone base stations they craftily classified them to fit within the less restrictive Part 25 class which is normally used by small installations for the likes of local systems such as that used by taxi operators and amateur radio enthusiasts. The system being straight forward no permission is required, the only difference is that of whether it is above or below 15 metres, then it is just down to the number of antenna, two below four above. Whilst there are other slight differences that is the main aspect, so in theory an operator could build a 30 metre mast/tower and put 4 antenna on it. Now the mast/tower is built and as we all know in the pecking order existing structures take precedence over new ground based masts, so normal phone operators will be queueing up to use them for serious mobile phone expansion.

There is a limited ability for the local planning authority to prevent the most sensitively sited installations by the making of Article 4 Directions that take away the permitted development rights from any given site. Even the restrictions on satellite dishes within conservation areas has been downgraded in order to allow this system to be rolled out uninterrupted. Therefore the only way of reducing this role-out is to mount a legal challenge, however based on past experience Planning Sanity is not convinced that is a realistic option.

So the new provisions how will they work. For England the provisions are contained in The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2005 and for Wales The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (Wales) Order 2006 which for all intents and purposes are identical and therefore I only refer to the English version. We also need to look at the ODPM Circular 10/2005 this sets out the Governments interpretation of the new provisions, albeit that as it rightly sets out in para 2 it is only the courts that can interpret legislation, therefore we shall have to see what if anything the courts make of the new provisions when and if they ever get to court, we deal with its provisions in more detail below.

As already stated the power that enables Sky and other satellite dishes on residential property is brought in by Schedule 2 Part 1 of the GPDO, both Class A and H being the relevant sections, the amendments are either crossed out if they have been removed or coloured red if they are additions under the new provisions:-

From this if you want to carry out any work on your home you can unless it falls into one of the restrictions in Class A.1, A.1(f) sets out:-

Thus under Class A there is a ban on the installation of microwave antenna, and moves towards satellite systems, whether these systems are safe or not is not a question for Planning Sanity, that is for those more qualified, what is clear is the ease by which the 7 (minimum) to 12 (maximum) new operators of these systems will be able to install their equipment. However, this gives a problem of interpretation, if microwave antenna are not permitted for installations under Part 25 but instead satellite antenna can be installed does this mean that any form of microwaves even if they are transmitted from a satellite are banned. This is important as satellite dishes also use microwave frequencies, the only difference being is that they are transmitted from the geo-orbital satellite rather than from terrestrially (and presumably as broadband would require a two way system they are also transmitted back from the dish to the satellite, albeit they are unlike mobile phone and other radio communications but use a line of sight). Circular 10/2005 sets out at paragraph that the interpretation of antennas should be taken from Article 2(1) of the 1995 version of the GPDO which sets out that microwave mean:-

And microwave antenna means:-

This clearly confuses rather than interprets, because as it sets out in Class A(f) above microwave antenna are specifically excluded from the permission granted by Class A. We therefore have to look at Class H but again confusion reigns. If Class A prevents, and Class H which only refers to satellite antenna permits, each conflicts with the other if the interpretation in Article 2(1) prevails. We must though take Class H as the all important provision, and presumably includes both terrestrial and microwave antenna, with all the health implications that entails:-

H.1 then going on to list the restrictions I set these out in full so that the entire picture can be seen.

First it is clear that we have moved from a satellite to a microwave antenna, and that overall the size of the antenna has increased. At face value it does not seem over daunting, other than houses will have a considerably greater number of antenna (dishes and well as whip like antenna). For a point of reference Article 1(5) land is land listed in Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the GPDO and include - a national park, an area of outstanding natural beauty, a conservation area, an area of natural beauty and amenity of the countryside and the Broads.

When we turn to Part 25 we see a similar picture

Class A

ODPM Circular 10/2005


The opening gambit at para 3 of the circular sets out rather blandly that the purpose of the GPDO is to deregulate the planning mechanisms for 'relatively uncontentious developments'. As mobile phone developments are amongst the most contentious of development types this seems a strange statement to make in relation to these new provisions. Most of the info in the Circular is of a very general nature, it does though in relatively simple terms et out in its three annexes the size and height restrictions under the new provisions, we have reproduced these below for your convenience:-

In addition to the above considerations there are those in direct relationship to the award by OFCOM of the licences to operate the new system. There are to be between 7 and 12 new licences for broadband, controlled by OFCPM, the process is to be set out in 4 new regulations drafts of these can be found in OFCOMs Briefing on the new process. We are not reviewing those aspects as they fall outside of the planning regime, however, you can download that paper from the OFCOM WEB site.

As I set out above the combination of the alterations to Parts 1 and 25 will effectively allow this whole new network to be rolled out without any ability for objection or interference by the public, elected representatives (councillors, MPs, AMs or MEPs) or the local planning authority. Only political action will reverse this position, we therefore need to ensure that we are pushing all the buttons, that we challenge this arrogant policy and bring back some resemblance of public participation to the planning process. The implementation of this process is a bad day for local justice in the UK.

It is intended that a process of lobbying of MPs, of challenges in the courts, of pressure from the media and the publication of all research undertaken into this section of telecommunications will be undertaken in an attempt to reverse this negative legislation.

© Planning Sanity - August 2008 (can be freely used by local communities within their campaigns.
Publication by third parties is permitted providing acknowledgment of Planning Sanity is given)
Top of Page


THIS CAMPAIGN IS FUNDED FROM YOUR DONATIONS - PLEASE GIVE GENEROUSLY
FUNDRAISING SECTION