JOIN
PLANNING SANITY
HERE

HELP US HELP YOU
our work relies upon your donations and subscriptions to survive
MAKE
A DONATION TO
PLANNING SANITY
HERE
Email
Planning
Sanity
HOME
PAGE
PLANNING SANITY HELPLINE
0871 750 3992
Calls 10p per minute

OTHER
FORUMS
Important
Legal
Notice
The following colour scheme applies to docs on this site Word Docs PDF Docs HTML Docs

HIGH COURT PLANNING DECISIONS

This section is still being completed. The listing below is waiting to be indexed, by volunteering this work will be completed faster.

  1. Mid-Sussex District Council v. William Charles Boyle [2001] EWHC QB 382 (20th July, 2001)
    There is before the court an application by the Mid-Sussex District Council for an injunction against the Defendant, Mr William Boyle, pursuant to s.187B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. It is provided that a local authority may apply to the court for an injunction where it considers it necessary or expedient for any actual or apprehended breach of planning control to be so restrained. The present claim relates to the use of land known as Small Acres in Clappers Lane, Fulking, West Sussex.

  2. Guise v. John Drew [2001] EWHC Ch 410 (8th June, 2001)
    This is a dispute over a right of way over the claimant's property to the defendant's property. It is accepted that there is a right of way by prescription, but the nature of the permissible usage of that right of way is disputed.

  3. Ceredigion County Council v. National Assembly for Wales and Mr E.D. Harrison [2001] EWHC Admin 694 (21st September, 2001)
    These proceedings arise out of enforcement notices issued by Ceredigion County Council against Mr E.D. Harrison in respect of alleged breaches of planning controls at a site known as Porthrhyd, Pontsian, Llandysul, Ceredigion. Mr Harrison appealed against the enforcement notices to the National Assembly of Wales, which appointed an inspector to determine the appeals. In a decision dated 20 February 2001 the inspector directed the variation of the enforcement notices so as to permit compliance within two years rather than the period of two months allowed in the original notices. Subject to that, he dismissed the appeals. The council now appeals under section 289 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against that decision. The reason for the council's appeal is not just a concern about the extension of time but a concern about the underlying reasoning. In essence, the inspector found that the site was the subject of an extant and valid planning permission, granted in 1973, and that Mr Harrison ought to be given time to complete its implementation; whereas the council's case is that the 1973 planning permission had lapsed and that the inspector erred in law in reaching a contrary conclusion.

  4. London Borough of Barnet v. SSHD and McCarthy & and Stone (Developments) Ltd [2001] EWHC Admin 642 (23rd August, 2001)
    This is an application by the Claimant under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for an order quashing the decision of the First Defendant given by letter dated 6 December 2000 allowing the appeal of the Second Defendant against the Claimant's failure to grant planning permission for a development of 43 sheltered apartments and ancillary accommodation and provision at the site at 178 High Road, East Finchley in London ("the site") and granting planning permission for that development.

  5. FIRST CORPORATE SHIPPING LIMITED (trading as BRISTOL PORT COMPANY) v. NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL [2001] EWHC Admin 586 (26th January, 2001)
    The Claimant, First Corporate Shipping Limited, is the owner and operator of the Port of Bristol and trades as "The Bristol Port Company" (hereafter called "BPC"). Royal Portbury Dock forms part of the Port of Bristol. The Defendant, North Somerset Council (hereafter called "NSC"), is the current relevant local Planning Authority for the area which includes Royal Portbury Dock. In these proceedings, which are brought under Section 287 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990("the 1990 Act"), BPC seek an Order that various specified parts of the North Somerset Local Plan 1999 (hereafter called "The NSLP 1999") be quashed, insofar as they relate to Royal Portbury Dock.

  6. BAKER v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT and REGIONS [2001] EWHC Admin 585 (26th January, 2001)
    This is an appeal under section 289 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ("the 1990 Act") against the decision of an Inspector appointed by the First Defendant, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, in which the Inspector dismissed the Appellants' appeal against an enforcement notice served by the second defendant, the North Wiltshire District Council, the local planning authority.

  7. LINDEN PRESCOTT DYASON v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS and CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL [2001] EWHC Admin 583 (18th January, 2001)
    The Claimant has a long running battle with the local planning authority about a building at Pathfinder Farm, Ramscote Lane, Chesham where he presently runs an ostrich farm. He bought the property in 1992 from a Miss Parrot. He had, apparently, erected a two storey agricultural building between 1986 and 1991 and was faced with enforcement notices from the local planning authority. They were subsequently withdrawn because they had been served on an incorrect footing.

  8. PERSIMMON HOMES (THAMES VALLEY) LTD TAYWOOD HOUSES LTD BRYANTS HOMES SOUTHERN LTD GARDEN VILLAGES PARTNERSHIP PLC v NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS Interested Party [2001] EWHC Admin 565 (20th July, 2001)
    This claim was listed before me following directions made by Silber, J on 28 February 2001 as an oral hearing for permission to apply for judicial review. The decision at issue is that of the defendants made at a meeting on 19 December 2000 to withdraw the draft Local Plan No.3 for the replacement of "North Hertfordshire District Local Plan No.2". Notice of that decision was given by letter dated 22 December 2000 pursuant to Regulation 25(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Plan)(England) Regulations 1999 (1999 No.3280), (the 1999 Regulations)

  9. Queen on the application of Alan Kathro; Michael Evans; Vivienne Evans; Patrick Grant and and Llantwit Fardre Community Council v. Rhondda Cynon Taff County Borough Council [2001] EWHC Admin 527 (6th July, 2001)
    The present proceedings are concerned not with the factual merits of the proposal, which are not a matter for decision by the court, but with a number of specific legal issues raised by the claimants. The claimants seek judicial review of the defendant's proposed determination of the planning application and of its decision to use a negotiated tendering procedure for the PFI scheme under EC rules on public procurement. In outline they submit that: (1) for the defendant, as local planning authority, to determine the planning application in respect of its own development on its own land will be in breach of the rights of the individual claimants to a determination by an independent and impartial tribunal under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: (2) the defendant is acting unlawfully in proposing to determine the planning application without requiring an environmental impact assessment; (3) the defendant has unlawfully fettered its discretion and predetermined the outcome of the planning application, and has failed to consult with an open mind; and (4) the decision to seek tenders for the project by way of the competitive negotiated procedure rather than the open or restricted procedure was legally flawed. Certain other matters originally canvassed are no longer pursued. Permission to apply for judicial review has been granted in respect of grounds (1) to (3). The application for permission in respect of ground (4) was adjourned to be dealt with at the substantive hearing. I have heard full argument on all issues still pursued.

  10. APPLEGARTH v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [2001] EWHC Admin 487 (28th June, 2001)
    This is an application pursuant to paragraph 12 of Schedule 15 to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 by John Speed Applegarth, who is and has at all material times been the owner of a property known as Boldon Hall. Mr Applegarth acts in person. He has taken enormous trouble in researching and preparing his case which he has presented, both on paper and orally, with, if I may say so, great care, skill, lucidity, courtesy and moderation.

  11. STRATFORD-ON-AVON DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and BOMFORD LIMITED [2001] EWHC Admin 467 (20th June, 2001)
    This is an application under s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 challenging a decision dated 20 December 2000 by an inspector appointed by the Secretary of State whereby the inspector allowed an appeal by Bomford Limited and granted its application for planning permission.

  12. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS and NEWARK AND SHERWOOD DISTRICT COUNCIL [2001] EWHC Admin 293 (29th March, 2001)
    This is an application under s. 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to quash a decision of the First Defendant, the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, given by his Inspector's decision letter dated 27th September 1999. The decision letter constitutes a redetermination of a planning appeal, where the initial decision was previously quashed by the Court on grounds irrelevant to the present proceedings.

  13. Ramsay v. Secretary for the State for the Environment Transport and The Regions And Suffolk Coastal District Council [2001] EWHC Admin 277 (11th April, 2001)
    There is before the court an appeal under Section 195 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ("the 1990 Act"). That appeal is against a decision of a planning inspector appointed by the first Defendant who upheld the second Defendant's refusal to grant a lawful development certificate ("L.D.C"). The Claimants had asked the second Defendant to certify as lawful for planning purposes their use of land at Hill Farm, Rushmere St. Andrew, Ipswich ("the appeal site") for the purpose of vehicular sports and leisure activities for a period not exceeding 28 days in any one calendar year. That application was made under Section 192 (1) (a) of the 1990 Act.

  14. QUEEN v. BEDFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ex parte HENLOW GRANGE HEALTH FARM LTD [2001] EWHC Admin 179 (13th March, 2001)
    The claimant is the owner and occupier of a property known as Henlow Grange Health Farm, a grade II* listed building. Adjoining the property is land which is the subject of an application for planning permission by Curson Developments Limited and Henlow Building Supplies Limited, interested parties to these proceedings. The claimant opposes the grant of planning permission. On 15 June 2000 the relevant committee of Bedfordshire County Council passed a resolution to grant planning permission. The resolution was, however, ineffective because the Secretary of State called in the application for determination by him pursuant to s.77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The call-in was made by an undated letter received on 14 September 2000.

  15. Queen on the application of Patrick John Benham-Crosswell; Katherine Anne De Benham-Crosswell and The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] EWHC Admin 146 (23rd February, 2001)
    This is an application for judicial review with the permission of the single judge, Sullivan J. granted on 28 September 2000 to quash the decision of an inspector on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions on 12 June 2000 not to entertain (and therefore not to determine) appeals brought by each of the two applicants against an Enforcement Notice issued on 13 October 1998 under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) by East Hampshire District Council, and for an order remitting the appeals to the Secretary of State and requiring him to consider and determine them.

  16. THURROCK BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and TERRY HOLDING [2001] EWHC Admin 128 (22nd February, 2001)
    The claimant, Thurrock Borough Council, seeks to challenge two decisions of the Secretary of State, by his Inspector (the first defendant). The decisions, communicated by letter dated 10 March 2000, ("the decision letter") allowed appeals by Mr Terry Holding (the second defendant) in respect of two enforcement notices served upon him in respect of Kings Farm, Parkers Farm Road, Orsett, Essex ("Kings Farm").

  17. SHEATH and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MID DEVON DISTRCT COUNCIL [2001] EWHC Admin 79 (5th February, 2001)
    This is an appeal by Mr and Mrs Sheath from the decision of Mr Paul Taylor, an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, dated 5 April 2000, granting a lawful development certificate to Mr & Mrs Sheath pursuant to Section 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, but not in a form they wanted. Their appeal is under section 288 (1) (b) of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990, on the grounds:
    1. that the decision of the Inspector was not within the powers conferred by the Act;
    2. that the requirements of the Act or of the Planning Tribunals Act 1992 or of orders, regulations or rules made under either Act had not been complied with.

  18. CASTLEFORD HOMES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR AND MAIDENHEAD [2001] EWHC Admin 77 (2nd February, 2001)
    Castleford Homes Ltd. sought planning permission for three alternative developments on land at Newlands Drive, Maidenhead in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. One application sought permission for 5 detached houses and the other two sought permission for 6 detached houses. Each would provide for substantial houses with large gardens on a site of approximately 1/2 ha. with a new gated access drive. The applications were full applications and so the siting of the houses formed part of the applications. None of the applications were determined by the Royal Borough and the appeals against non-determination were heard by an inspector appointed by the Secretary of State, who, following an Inquiry in June 2000, dismissed each appeal.

  19. FIRST CORPORATE SHIPPING LIMITED (trading as BRISTOL PORT COMPANY) v. NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL [2001] EWHC Admin 19 (26th January, 2001)
    The Claimant, First Corporate Shipping Limited, is the owner and operator of the Port of Bristol and trades as "The Bristol Port Company" (hereafter called "BPC"). Royal Portbury Dock forms part of the Port of Bristol. The Defendant, North Somerset Council (hereafter called "NSC"), is the current relevant local Planning Authority for the area which includes Royal Portbury Dock. In these proceedings, which are brought under Section 287 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990("the 1990 Act"), BPC seek an Order that various specified parts of the North Somerset Local Plan 1999 (hereafter called "The NSLP 1999") be quashed, insofar as they relate to Royal Portbury Dock.

  20. WIGGINS V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS HON. JUSTICE COLLINS [2000] EWHC Admin 436 (21st December, 2000)
    This is an appeal under s.289 of the Town an Country Planning Act 1990 by Cecil Wiggins and Wiggins transport Ltd. whereby they seek to quash an enforcement notice which was substantially upheld by an inspector on 8 May 2000 following an inquiry held between 28 and 30 March 2000.

  21. QUEEN ON APPLICATION OF HOLDING AND BARNES PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS QUEEN ON APPLICATION OF PREMIER LEISURE UK LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS QUEEN ON APPLICATION OF ALCONBURY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LIMITED [2000] EWHC Admin 432 (13th December, 2000) 205792 bytes)
    These four applications raise the very important question whether the processes by which the Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions (SSETR) makes decisions under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA) and orders under the Transport and Works Act 1992 (TWA), the Highways Act 1980 (HA) and the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 (ALA) are compatible with Article 6 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

  22. QUEEN v. SOUTH HOLLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL A ppellant ex parte LINCOLN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD [2000] EWHC Admin 419 (14th November, 2000) 51120 bytes)
    This is an application by the Lincoln Co-operative Society Ltd (the Co-op), brought with the permission of Scott Baker J, for judicial review of a decision of the South Holland District Council Development Control (Planning) Committee (the Council) on the 23rd February 2000, when they granted planning permission to Westry Developments Ltd (Westry) for a retail development at a site at Station Yard, Long Sutton, Lincolnshire.

  23. TELECOM SECURICOR CELLULAR RADIO LIMITED v. NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES v. BRECON BEACONS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY [2000] EWHC Admin 412 (2nd November, 2000) 25548 bytes)
    The case concerns a challenge under s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to a decision dated 11 January 2000 of an inspector appointed by the National Assembly for Wales. The decision was made under s.78 of the 1990 Act against a refusal by the Brecon Beacons National Park Authority to grant planning permission. The appellant - the claimant in this court - was Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio Limited, also known aS BT Cellnet. It had sought planning permission for the erection of a telecommunications mast and ancillary development near the village of Bwlch, which is situated on the A40 (T) between Brecon and Abergavenny. The facility was said to be needed in order to fill a gap in BT Cellnet's mobile telephone network. The site of the proposed development is situated in the Brecon Beacons National Park. It is close to an existing telecommunications tower used by other operators.

  24. RUMSEY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 399 (11th October, 2000) 32836 bytes)
    The Claimant sought planning permission for an extension to his house, by way of adding a floor to the existing bungalow, and approximately doubling its present size. The house "Beechnut House", Green Lea Wood, Frensham Hall Estate, Haslemere, is one of a number scattered in the countryside of Waverley Borough Council, beyond the Green Belt, in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and an Area of Great Landscape Value. Waverley Borough Council refused planning permission because of the harmful conflict, which it thought the proposal had, with various policies for the protection of the countryside and with its restrictive policy, HS7, for extensions to dwellings in such a location.

  25. RETAIL MEDIA and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MACCLESFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 398 (11th October, 2000) 25405 bytes)
    Retail Media Ltd., the Claimant and formerly known as Citilite Ltd., specialises in the display of internally illuminated poster panels. It lost an appeal which it made to the Secretary of State against Macclesfield Borough Council's refusal of express advertising consent for an internally illuminated 6 sheet poster panel outside a supermarket, close to Poynton town centre and nearly opposite a bus shelter with two illuminated 6 sheet poster panel advertisements integrated into it

  26. FEDERAL MOGUL CORPORATION v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [2000] EWHC Admin 395 (11th October, 2000) 33218 bytes)
    Federal Mogul Ltd., the Claimant was refused planning permission for the redevelopment for housing purposes of its former engineering works, at Netherhampton Road, Harnham, Salisbury. The site includes a range of industrial, storage and office buildings, including two large factory buildings, and a number of specialist buildings including a chrome plating building. The site closed for business in December 1998.

  27. ALAN FRANK SAGE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 394 (11th October, 2000) 39578 bytes)
    This is an appeal under s289(1) Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against the decision of an Inspector dismissing the Claimant's appeal against an enforcement notice issued by Maidstone Borough Council on 19th March 1999. Three enforcement notices were the subject of decisions in the same letter by the Inspector. I am concerned only with Appeal B, which was made in respect of an enforcement notice, which, as corrected by the Inspector, alleged that there had been an breach of planning control by "the partial erection of a dwelling house," described as Building A. The notice required the demolition of the building and the removal of all the resultant materials.

  28. QUEEN v. DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 393 (6th October, 2000) 43959 bytes)
    Derbyshire County Council ("the Council") is the local planning authority in relation to waste disposal facilities in its area. There is an established landfill site known as the Hall Lane Site close to the village of Barrow Hill which is just outside the town of Staveley. On 20 March 2000 the Council, through its Environmental Services Planning Development Subcommittee, granted planning permission for an extension in the use and duration of the Hall Lane Site. This involved a larger area, the extraction of 120,000 tonnes of clay, the incidental extraction of 1000 tonnes of coal and the provision of a fourth waste cell with an additional 650,000 tonnes of waste disposal capacity and extending the life of the landfill operation by about one year to December 2005.

  29. MS BEYERS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and UTTLESFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 387 (31st August, 2000) 68119 bytes)
    In this application, Mr M S Beyers applies under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ("the 1990 Act") to quash the decision of the First Defendant, dismissing the Claimant's appeal against (1) the refusal of consent by the Second Defendant under the District of Uttlesford (Great Dunmow) (No 1) Tree Preservation Order 1981 ("the TPO") for the felling of an oak tree at 1, The Close, Great Dunmow, Essex, and (2) the issue of a certificate under Article 5 of the TPO that the Second Defendant was satisfied that the tree had special amenity value.

  30. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and J BROWN [2000] EWHC Admin 386 (31st August, 2000) 72592 bytes)
    In this appeal Buckinghamshire County Council appeals under Section 289 of the Town and Country Planning Act ("the 1990 Act") against a decision by an Inspector appointed by the First Respondent, allowing the appeal of the Second Respondent against an Enforcement Notice issued on the 8th December 1995 in respect of a building at Westhorpe Farm, Little Marlow ("the Building"). The Enforcement Notice was in respect of the change of use of the Building to an engineering workshop.

  31. PALACEGATE PROPERTIES LIMITED v. LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN [2000] EWHC Admin 372 (19th July, 2000) 76031 bytes)
    This is an appeal by case stated against a decision of the Knightsbridge Crown Court made on 19 March 1999 when that court dismissed the appellants' appeal against their conviction on 20 April 1998 by the Stipendiary Magistrate at the West London Magistrates Court of an offence of breach of an enforcement notice, contrary to s.179(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The case requires the court to revisit well-trodden ground: how far may a defendant challenge, by way of defence to a criminal prosecution, the instrument or order which founds the prosecution against him on grounds which could have been raised upon an application for judicial review? For convenience I will call this the "collateral challenge issue".

  32. QUEEN and Northampton Borough Council ex parte Northampton Rapid Transit System [2000] EWHC Admin 367 (10th July, 2000) 52458 bytes)
    In these proceedings the Claimant, Northampton Rapid System Ltd., applies for permission to apply for relief by way of Judicial review of the decision of Northampton Borough council (hereafter NBC), taken on 17 April 2000, to grant Planning Permission to English Partnership (formerly the Commission for New Towns and hereafter referred to as `E.P') for the development of Phase 1 of the land at Upton, Northampton, hereafter called "the proposed development".

  33. TESCO STORES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [2000] EWHC Admin 349 (25th May, 2000) 57892 bytes)
    This is a claim by Tesco Stores Ltd ("Tesco") under s.288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 challenging a decision of the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions contained in a letter dated 25 May 2000. By that decision, made on a call-in under s.77 of the 1990 Act, the Secretary of State refused planning permission for a proposed development of a supermarket on the site of a former bus depot at Quinton, Birmingham.

  34. R V Restormel Borough Council ex parte Parkyn v. R V Restormel Borough council ex parte Corbett [2000] EWHC Admin 344 (19th May, 2000) 112207 bytes)
    The claimants in this case, both councillors of Restormel Borough Council, seek by judicial review to challenge four decisions of the council as local planning authority. Councillor Parkyn does so on behalf of the council itself, Councillor Corbett in a private capacity. Three of the decisions are grants of planning permission, and the fourth relates to an agreement under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, on parts of the Victoria Business Park at Roche in Cornwall. The purpose of the challenge is to relieve the council of the obligation to pay compensation to the landowners in consequence of an order made by the Secretary of the State for the Environment Transport and the Regions modifying one of the permissions. Permission to apply for judicial review was granted to Councillor Parkyn by Sullivan J on 19 May 2000 and to Councillor Corbett by Forbes J on 30 June 2000 after Collins J had refused permission on paper.

  35. QUEEN V SECRETARY OF STATE for the ENVIRONMENT Ex parte ROCHFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 337 (12th May, 2000) 21091 bytes)
    This is an application for judicial review of the decision of a planning inspector dated 23rd October 1998 under which he determined that there should be a partial costs order in favour of developers. There had been an appeal to the inspector against the non-determination of a planning application by the applicants (the District Council) under which the developers had applied for permission to develop 45 category II sheltered apartments for the elderly together with manager's accommodation and ancillary facilities on land at 63-69 Eastwood Road, Rayleigh, Essex.

  36. ENTERPRISE INNS PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 333 (19th April, 2000) 19713 bytes)
    Within a short distance of the junction of Lime Street, William Brown Street and London Road in the centre of Liverpool some of the finest Nineteenth Century civil buildings in England are to be found. Not surprisingly, it is part of a conservation area. The area also includes the Empire Theatre, a Grade II listed building dating from the 1920s. Liverpool City Council (the Council) favours the redevelopment of an area close to the Empire Theatre so as to provide improved facilities for the theatre. To this end the Council promulgated the City of Liverpool (London Road) Compulsory Purchase Order 1998 under section 226 (1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Acquisition of Land Act 1981. The Order relates to three plots comprising premises in London Road, one of which is a public house known as the Legs of Man. It stands on the corner of London Road and Lime Street. It is in a good state of repair, being a remodelling of an earlier building carried out in the 1950s. On a number of days between October 1998 and February 1999 an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions held an Inquiry in connection with an application for confirmation of the Order. On 30 April 1999 the Inspector recommended confirmation. By a letter dated 21 June 1999 the Secretary of State decided to accept the recommendation of the Inspector and confirmed the Order without modification. On 2 August 1999 Notice of Confirmation was published.

  37. FRIEND And NATIONAL ASSEMBLY FOR WALES NEWPORT BOROUGH COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 332 (18th April, 2000) 49691 bytes)
    This is a statutory appeal from the decision of an inspector who dismissed three appeals which had been brought before him by the applicant. Those appeals were brought against the service of three enforcement notices served on the applicant by the respondent Borough Council in respect of what was alleged to have been three breaches of planning control by the applicant as the owner of land and buildings at Trinco House, Penhow, Newport. The three notices have throughout been referred to as A, B and C and related to separate aspects of the applicant's conduct on his land. Thus:
    1. Notice A, alleged the change of use to a dwelling house without planning permission of a building formerly used for pleasure purposes;
    2. Notice B, alleged the erection of a building and lamp standards, without planning permission;
    3. Notice C, alleged a change of use of agricultural land to use as residential curtilage.

  38. William Morrison Supermarkets Plc and Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport & Regions [2000] EWHC Admin 331 (18th April, 2000) 27388 bytes)
    This is an application by William Morrison Supermarkets Plc ("the Applicant") under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ("the 1990 Act") to quash a Decision in a letter dated the 16th March 1999 ("the Decision") of the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions ("the Secretary of State"). By the Decision of the Secretary of State, following the recommendation of a report by an inspector ("the Inspector"), dismissed the Applicant's appeal under Section 78 of the 1990 Act against the refusal by the Stockton on Tees Borough Council ("SBC") to grant planning permission for a superstore, petrol filling station and training centre on the appeal site at Stockton & Billingham Technical College ("the College"). The Applicant's complaint is that it has been substantially prejudiced by the failure of the Secretary of State to take into account two factors recognised by the Inspector as favouring the grant of the permission and the conduct of the Secretary of State in receiving and taking into account representations made after the date of the Inspector's report without communicating them to the Applicant and affording the Applicant an opportunity to comment on them.

  39. MACGAY LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v.; HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL v.; HEATHER I'VE ASSOCIATES v.; JJ HARRISON (PROPERTIES) LIMITED v. and SWAYFIELDS LIMITED [2000] EWHC Admin 330 (14th April, 2000) 66212 bytes)
    In 1992 the then Government adopted a policy to upgrade the A1 Trunk Road to motorway standard. One consequence of this was that it was necessary to consider whether to develop motorway service areas (MSAs) to serve the motorway once the road was upgraded. One of the proposed MSAs is in the Harrogate district on a site north of Ferrybridge. The local planning authority there is the Harrogate Borough Council. A number of applications for planning permission in respect of an outline application were made to the Council. They related to four different areas.

  40. QUEEN v. EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL ex parte MARTIN ARNOLD PHILCOX [2000] EWHC Admin 325 (13th April, 2000) 15969 bytes)

  41. QUEEN v. EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL ex parte MARTIN ARNOLD PHILCOX [2000] EWHC Admin 324 (13th April, 2000)

  42. Braithwaite v. Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council [2000] EWHC Admin 306 (17th March, 2000)

  43. ADT AUCTIONS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and HART DISTRICT COUNCIL [2000] EWHC Admin 305 (16th March, 2000)

  44. QUEEN v. LEICESTER COUNTY COUNCIL HEPWORTH BUILDING PRODUCTS LIMITED and ONYX (UK) LIMITED RESPONDANT EX PARTE BLACKFORDBY and BOOTHCORPE ACTION GROUP LTD [2000] EWHC Admin 304 (15th March, 2000)

  45. THAMES WATER UTILITIES LTD. v. LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY [2000] EWHC Admin 301 (4th March, 2000) 21484 bytes)

  46. FERNBACK; RODNEY LEE BERGER; ADRIAN MARTIN JACOBS; VALERIE JUNE STRACHAN and STEPHEN YIN CHING WONG v. LONDON BOROUGH OF HARROW [2000] EWHC Admin 278 (11th April, 2000) 68810 bytes)

  47. ELMBRIDGE BOROUGH COUNCIL and RESIDENTS AND LANDOWNERS' GROUP (ELMBRIDGE) v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS SWAYFIELDS LIMITED [1999] EWHC Admin 824 (22nd October, 1999) 205561 bytes)

  48. ROSSINGTON HALL INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 810 (20th August, 1999) 87029 bytes)

  49. FARADENE LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 807 (20th August, 1999) 40563 bytes)

  50. CALA HOMES (SOUTH) LIMITED v. CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 805 (20th August, 1999) 70506 bytes)

  51. Nalkin & Ornstin V Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions [1999] EWHC Admin 788 (6th August, 1999) 35681 bytes)

  52. DOUGLAS JOHN MERRITT v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MENDIP DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 783 (5th August, 1999) 80096 bytes)

  53. ALNWICK DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and SAFEWAY STORES PLC AND OTHERS [1999] EWHC Admin 782 (4th August, 1999) 97297 bytes)

  54. TANDRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. MICHAEL DELANEY; PATRICK CONNORS and MICHAEL CONNORS [1999] EWHC Admin 781 (3rd August, 1999) 82973 bytes)

  55. OLDHAM MBC and PUGMANOR PROPERTIES LTD ex parte Foster, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 774 (30th July, 1999) 60694 bytes)

  56. LONDON BOROUGH OF HILLINGDON v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT; HILLINGDON HOSPITAL NHS TRUST; CLINICAL ENERGY LIMITED; ENVIRONMENTAL INCINERATION COMPANY LIMITED and BFH INCINERATION LIMITED [1999] EWHC Admin 772 (30th July, 1999) 205961 bytes)

  57. EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL (EX PARTE REPROTECH (PEBSHAM) LIMITED), R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 769 (30th July, 1999) 55668 bytes)

  58. SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE MORRIS and PERRY (GURNEY SLADE QUARRY) LIMITED, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 766 (29th July, 1999) 50316 bytes)

  59. EDEN RESTAURANTS (HOLBORN) LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and COUNCIL OF CITY OF WESTMINSTER [1999] EWHC Admin 759 (29th July, 1999) 58006 bytes)

  60. LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. LEX SERVICE PLC [1999] EWHC Admin 748 (28th July, 1999) 56962 bytes)

  61. DURHAM COUNTY COUNCIL SHERBURN STONE COMPANY LIMITED EX PARTE HUDDLESTONE, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 745 (28th July, 1999) 23429 bytes)

  62. APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION SEFTON [1999] EWHC Admin 728 (23rd July, 1999) 12524 bytes)

  63. HUDSCOTT ESTATES(EAST) LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE for the ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT and REGIONS and WOKINGHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 713 (20th July, 1999) 46849 bytes)

  64. BEDFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL FD O'DELL & SONS LIMITED ex parte MASON and ORS (As Representatives of the Langford Action Group), R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 676 (13th July, 1999) 97857 bytes)

  65. TARMAC MATERIALS LTD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1999] EWHC Admin 644 (6th July, 1999) 35668 bytes)

  66. ALFRED McALPINE HOMES (YORKSHIRE) LIMITED v. KIRKLEES METROPOLITAN COUNCIL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [1999] EWHC Admin 586 (23rd June, 1999) 23824 bytes)

    Top of Page

  67. HOWARD DAVIES and ANN DAVIES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. BLACK PRINCE HOLIDAYS LIMITED [1999] EWHC Admin 575 (21st June, 1999) 53899 bytes)

  68. RADIO AUTHORITY (EX PARTE WILDMAN), R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 559 (17th June, 1999) 70730 bytes)

  69. SKERRITTS OF NOTTINGHAM LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. and HARROW LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 519 (4th June, 1999) 45801 bytes)

  70. DOREEN EDNA MILES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ROYAL BOROUGH OF KINGSTON UPON THAMES [1999] EWHC Admin 518 (4th June, 1999) 52036 bytes)

  71. EBBISHAM FARM LIVERY STABLES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. REIGATE AND BANSTEAD BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 516 (2nd June, 1999) 45198 bytes)

  72. JOHN FRANCIS PANVERT v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and TONBRIDGE and MALLING BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 514 (1st June, 1999) 51526 bytes)

  73. BRITTON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED v. TENDRING DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 509 (28th May, 1999) 74346 bytes)

  74. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH EX PARTE PFIZER LTD, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 504 (26th May, 1999) 121955 bytes)

  75. CHARLES CHURCH DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL and SECRETARY OF STATE [1999] EWHC Admin 500 (26th May, 1999) 42143 bytes)

  76. JOHN HEARNE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES and CARMARTHENSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 494 (25th May, 1999) 40316 bytes)

  77. KLEANTHOUS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [1999] EWHC Admin 482 (24th May, 1999) 58138 bytes)

  78. EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE MARTIN PHILCOX, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 450 (18th May, 1999) 47928 bytes)

  79. LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS and NEWS INTERNATIONAL (A FIRM) EX PARTE GWENDOLEN TILLY, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 423 (11th May, 1999) 10089 bytes)

  80. ROCHDALE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE ANDREW TEW ;; GEORGE DANIEL MILNE ; and STEVEN GARNER, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 409 (7th May, 1999) 126210 bytes)

  81. CARDIFF COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE BROWN, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 379 (30th April, 1999) 96138 bytes)

  82. PATRICK LEONARD BERRIDGE and Others v. DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 375 (29th April, 1999) 46623 bytes)

  83. CARADON DISTRICT COUNCIL Ex parte LOVEJOY, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 355 (26th April, 1999) 29175 bytes)

  84. MALDON DISTRICT Council v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and W. DRAPER [1999] EWHC Admin 342 (22nd April, 1999) 32379 bytes)

  85. CHARTWELL LAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. LONDON BOROUGH OF HILLINGDON [1999] EWHC Admin 310 (16th April, 1999) 25958 bytes)

  86. ST EDMUNDSBURY BOROUGH COUNCIL (ex parte WALTON), R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 298 (13th April, 1999) 48515 bytes)

  87. R. V BOLSOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE PATERSON [1999] EWHC Admin 292 (7th April, 1999) 26622 bytes)

  88. LICHFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL CHRISTOPHER JOHN NANSCAWEN WILLIAMS and Ex parte LICHFIELD SECURITIES LIMITED, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 291 (1st April, 1999) 73329 bytes)

  89. BOYLE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 283 (31st March, 1999) 42689 bytes)

  90. SKERRITTS OF NOTTINGHAM LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. HARROW LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 250 (22nd March, 1999) 45565 bytes)

  91. JOHN and JOSEPH DAVENPORT v. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM [1999] EWHC Admin 248 (22nd March, 1999) 56025 bytes)

  92. ROGER RAYMOND JARMAIN and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS WELWYN HATFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 225 (12th March, 1999) 28770 bytes)

  93. BLOOMFIELD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 217 (10th March, 1999) 44916 bytes)

  94. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT EX PARTE WEBSTER, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 213 (8th March, 1999) 40600 bytes)

  95. ROBERT IAN McCARTHY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 212 (8th March, 1999) 37086 bytes)

  96. VALE OF WHITE HORSE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT , TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. C M JONES AND S A JONES [1999] EWHC Admin 201 (4th March, 1999) 35166 bytes)

  97. R v. HUNTINGDONSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE CARTER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS LTD [1999] EWHC Admin 199 (4th March, 1999) 20141 bytes)

  98. PETER FRANCIS BRIDLE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and CHELMSFORD DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 190 (3rd March, 1999) 20631 bytes)

  99. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL; BROXTOWE BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and RJB MINING (UK)LTD [1999] EWHC Admin 188 (3rd March, 1999) 49166 bytes)

  100. F SAADA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 183 (2nd March, 1999) 28524 bytes)

  101. STAFFORD CROWN COURT ex parte WILF GILBERT (STAFFS) LIMITED, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 167 (22nd February, 1999) 32256 bytes)

  102. PRESTON CROWN COURT EX PARTE MICHAEL NORMAN JOLLY, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 164 (22nd February, 1999) 10664 bytes)

  103. IN THE MATTER of a site at Strikes Garden Centre, Eaglescliffe, Near Yarm, Stockton-on-Tees AND IN THE MATTER of section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 [1999] EWHC Admin 156 (19th February, 1999) 84093 bytes)

  104. BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and CA FOLKES AA FOLKES EG MASON J ALLEN [1999] EWHC Admin 143 (16th February, 1999) 43683 bytes)

  105. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS Ex parte Borough of Kirklees, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 133 (12th February, 1999) 39879 bytes)

  106. QUEEN v. WREXHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL Ex parte KATHLEEN CHRISTINE WALL; FLORENCE BERRY; ANN PURCELL; THOMAS BERRY and ANN MARIE WHITEHOUSE [1999] EWHC Admin 131 (12th February, 1999) 96197 bytes)

  107. TANDRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. MICHAEL DELANEY PATRICK CONNORS MICHAEL CONNORS [1999] EWHC Admin 79 (29th January, 1999) 37515 bytes)

  108. PATRICK DELANEY ANN MARIE DELANEY EMMA SUSANNE DELANEY MARGARET ANN BRIEN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY [1999] EWHC Admin 76 (29th January, 1999) 38895 bytes)

  109. GEORGE BIDDLE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 67 (28th January, 1999) 19322 bytes)

  110. EDWIN SMITH v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES v. RHONDDA CYNON TAFF COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 66 (28th January, 1999) 17051 bytes)

  111. PETER GREENWOOD and Others v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 62 (27th January, 1999) 27958 bytes)

  112. WILLIAM CHARLES BOYLE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. MID SUSSEX DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 61 (26th January, 1999) 24064 bytes)

  113. CALLIOPIE ANTONIADES; PRAXITELIS ANTONIADES and RUTH ANTONIADES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET [1999] EWHC Admin 55 (25th January, 1999) 17778 bytes)

  114. RICHARDSON DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 45 (20th January, 1999) 31475 bytes)

  115. LEICESTER CITY COUNCIL and WM MORRISON SUPERMARKETS PLC and POWERGEN UK PLC EX PARTE SAFEWAY STORES, R v. [1999] EWHC Admin 37 (18th January, 1999) 30252 bytes)

  116. McCLEAN HOMES (EAST ANGLIA) LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and CHELMSFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 9 (8th January, 1999) 53147 bytes)

  117. The Queen v. The Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and Regions Ex parte BATH and NORTH EAST SOMERSET DISTRICT COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 8 (6th January, 1999) 51070 bytes)

  118. LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and COLIN TEE and CAROL TEE [1999] EWHC Admin 6 (6th January, 1999) 21188 bytes)

  119. HYDE PARK RESIDENCE LIMITED v. SECRETARY FOR ENVIRONMENT , TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL [1999] EWHC Admin 5 (6th January, 1999) 70204 bytes)

  120. BERNARD JOHN PANTON and ALLAN WENTWORTH FARMER v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT , TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and and VALE OF WHITE HORSE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 1138 (16th December, 1998) 42453 bytes)

  121. MARGARET HARRIS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and EAST HAMPSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 1095 (27th November, 1998) 31935 bytes)

  122. MANSFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL Ex parte ASHFIELD NOMINEES LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 1091 (26th November, 1998) 21163 bytes)

  123. WALTON v. SEDGEFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 1071 (16th November, 1998) 24708 bytes)

  124. CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA Ex parte Granada Hospitality Limited, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 1066 (13th November, 1998) 63472 bytes)

  125. LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [1998] EWHC Admin 1064 (12th November, 1998) 30490 bytes)

  126. SOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and GRE GREGORY [1998] EWHC Admin 1063 (11th November, 1998) 36103 bytes)

  127. INTERPUB LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and CITY OF WESTMINSTER [1998] EWHC Admin 1060 (10th November, 1998) 38144 bytes)

  128. LYMINGTON PRECISION ENGINEERS AND CO. LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and NEW FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 1057 (9th November, 1998) 38916 bytes)

  129. Cherry Tree Investments v. Chairman Of Greater Manchester Rent Assessment Committee and Others [1998] EWHC Admin 1045 (5th November, 1998) 169537 bytes)

  130. HAMBLETON DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE SOMERFIELD STORES LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 1033 (3rd November, 1998) 129276 bytes)

  131. LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS, FURNITURE VILLAGE PLC AND K F GROUP PLC [1998] EWHC Admin 1019 (29th October, 1998) 44188 bytes)

  132. ROGER LOVEJOY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and CARADON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 1011 (27th October, 1998) 27670 bytes)

  133. BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS Plc v. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 989 (21st October, 1998) 46184 bytes)

  134. ALLIANCE AGAINST BIRMINGHAM NORTHERN RELIEF ROAD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MIDLAND EXPRESSWAY LTD [1998] EWHC Admin 985 (20th October, 1998) 91358 bytes)

  135. [1998] EWHC Admin 976 (19th October, 1998) 35561 bytes)

  136. MARC JOHN GEALL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT and REGIONS v. LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 958 (14th October, 1998) 27297 bytes)

  137. [1998] EWHC Admin 928 (7th October, 1998) 29905 bytes)

  138. [1998] EWHC Admin 916 (5th October, 1998) 17002 bytes)

    Top of Page

  139. KENNET DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE SOMERFIELD PROPERTY COMPANY LIMITED and SOMERFIELD STORES LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 900 (29th September, 1998) 23184 bytes)

  140. HAMPSTEAD PROPERTIES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and TRAFFORD METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 892 (24th September, 1998) 18027 bytes)

  141. PATRICK CHARLES LYNCH v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and BASILDON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 888 (22nd September, 1998) 31396 bytes)

  142. PROWTING PROJECTS LIMITED v. WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL FIRST and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS SECOND [1998] EWHC Admin 886 (15th September, 1998) 49620 bytes)

  143. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM Ex parte ABRAMS, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 879 (11th September, 1998) 25580 bytes)

  144. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM Ex parte ABRAMS, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 878 (11th September, 1998) 25580 bytes)

  145. I'M YOUR MAN LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1998] EWHC Admin 866 (4th September, 1998) 43846 bytes)

  146. [1998] EWHC Admin 841 (8th August, 1998) 34595 bytes)

  147. NAYLOR RAWLINGS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 839 (7th August, 1998) 20646 bytes)

  148. FAIRCLOUGH HOMES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and COLCHESTER BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 838 (7th August, 1998) 40423 bytes)

  149. TERENCE CHARLES MEASOTHE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and TUNBRIDGE WELLS BOROUGH COUNCIL, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 837 (6th August, 1998) 52184 bytes)

  150. DMC RECYCLING LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and HERTFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 834 (6th August, 1998) 47296 bytes)

  151. JOHN CLARK DEALY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. NORTH EAST DERBYSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 831 (4th August, 1998) 30308 bytes)

  152. DAVENTRY DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and MOULTON FOOTBALL CLUB [1998] EWHC Admin 830 (3rd August, 1998) 26259 bytes)

  153. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS EX PARTE WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 812 (30th July, 1998) 76389 bytes)

  154. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT EX PARTE DOREEN SMITH, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 811 (30th July, 1998) 9481 bytes)

  155. MILES CRABTREE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA [1998] EWHC Admin 807 (30th July, 1998) 32056 bytes)

  156. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS EX PARTE CARTER COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 798 (29th July, 1998) 45852 bytes)

  157. LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY EX PARTE CRYSTAL PALACE CAMPAIGN AND OTHERS, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 787 (27th July, 1998) 25153 bytes)

  158. NORTHUMBERLAND NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY; NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY COUNCIL and TYNEDALE COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 731 (9th July, 1998) 29346 bytes)

  159. ANDREW DONALD NICOLSON v. BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 678 (29th June, 1998) 35985 bytes)

  160. O'BRIEN v. LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON [1998] EWHC Admin 676 (26th June, 1998) 29254 bytes)

  161. QUEEN v. TORBAY BOROUGH COUNCIL Ex parte CHUNG TAK LAM [1998] EWHC Admin 671 (25th June, 1998) 53533 bytes)

  162. MILTON KEYNES BOROUGH COUNCIL and GREENE KING PLC EX PARTE WAVENDON GOLF CENTRE LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 666 (24th June, 1998) 102717 bytes)

  163. SOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and BERKELEY HOMES LIMITED [1998] EWHC Admin 656 (22nd June, 1998) 35805 bytes)

  164. ALFRED MCALPINE HOMES NORTHUMBRIA LIMITED v. DARLINGTON BC AND YUILL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. DARLINGTON BC [1998] EWHC Admin 646 (18th June, 1998) 81571 bytes)

  165. WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL v. KEVIN MORAN [1998] EWHC Admin 637 (12th June, 1998) 24951 bytes)

  166. OXFORD DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE and WEST OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [1998] EWHC Admin 629 (11th June, 1998) 38397 bytes)

  167. CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. CHARTWELL LAND PROPERTIES LIMITED [1998] EWHC Admin 606 (5th June, 1998) 49551 bytes)

  168. JOHN SAMUEL v. SECRETARY OF SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT and REGIONS v. SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL (FORMERLY NORTHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL) [1998] EWHC Admin 605 (4th June, 1998) 51986 bytes)

  169. FA SAUNDERS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and WEST OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 604 (4th June, 1998) 30786 bytes)

  170. BELSTER PROPERTIES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1998] EWHC Admin 595 (2nd June, 1998) 27909 bytes)

  171. LANGLEY PARK BOYS SCHOOL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY [1998] EWHC Admin 594 (27th May, 1998) 32179 bytes)

  172. RAYMOND JOHN MAIN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and SOUTH OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 590 (22nd May, 1998) 42461 bytes)

  173. VESTLEY ESTATES LIMITED v. SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS [1998] EWHC Admin 583 (21st May, 1998) 47113 bytes)

  174. M FISHETHE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 580 (21st May, 1998) 9705 bytes)

  175. FURNESS CARS AND COMMERCIALS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and and BARROW BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 569 (20th May, 1998) 19606 bytes)

  176. CITY OF WAKEFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL AND YORKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED EX PARTE WARMFIELD COMPANY LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 545 (15th May, 1998) 59722 bytes)

  177. ARTHUR SIDNEY PETTER; MONICA MARY WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT & REGIONS and CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 544 (15th May, 1998) 47747 bytes)

  178. DUNCAN ANTHONY LYNN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and MACCLESFIELD BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 540 (14th May, 1998) 28631 bytes)

  179. CHARLES CHURCH DEVELOPMENT LIMITED v. SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1998] EWHC Admin 527 (12th May, 1998) 76984 bytes)

  180. QUEEN v. NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH COUNCIL Proposed Ex parte RICE & CO (NORTHAMPTON) LTD and ANTHONY JOSEPH PERRETT & LINDA MARGARET PERRETT (Trading as A J and L PERRETT (a Firm) [1998] EWHC Admin 510 (8th May, 1998) 70500 bytes)

  181. ASHFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE SHEPWAY DISTRICT COUNCIL, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 488 (7th May, 1998) 57045 bytes)

  182. PYE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and NORTH CORNWALL DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 483 (5th May, 1998) 64963 bytes)

  183. JACKSON v. DAVENTRY DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 476 (1st May, 1998) 52511 bytes)

  184. MORRIS and PERRY LIMITED v. SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 464 (29th April, 1998) 48321 bytes)

  185. DAVID SAXBY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 462 (29th April, 1998) 27242 bytes)

  186. SOLIHULL BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE BERKSWELL PARISH COUNCIL, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 460 (28th April, 1998) 31847 bytes)

  187. NORTH DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. D ROTTENBURY B E ROTTENBURY [1998] EWHC Admin 458 (28th April, 1998) 34445 bytes)

  188. MODERN HOMES (WHITWORTH) LIMITED t/a BOWER CONSTRUCTION v. LANCASHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 448 (27th April, 1998) 60409 bytes)

  189. BRITISH ALCAN ALUMINIUM PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 446 (27th April, 1998) 54959 bytes)

  190. BRITISH ALCAN ALUMINIUM PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 445 (27th April, 1998) 54960 bytes)

  191. CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL Ex parte KIRDFORD CONSERVATION SOCIETY, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 436 (24th April, 1998) 15539 bytes)

  192. PEEL INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. BURY METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 425 (21st April, 1998) 46973 bytes)

  193. SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE ROBERT OLIVER LAWRENCE WICKHAM, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 422 (9th April, 1998) 61698 bytes)

  194. BRECKLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE BUDGENS STORES LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 417 (8th April, 1998) 25877 bytes)

  195. LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and CHAUCER ESTATES LTD and PEACEHAVEN VALLEY OWNERS LTD [1998] EWHC Admin 397 (3rd April, 1998) 34670 bytes)

  196. AL WOOD-ROBINSON v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and COUNCIL OF LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH [1998] EWHC Admin 394 (3rd April, 1998) 27761 bytes)

  197. McLEAN HOMES MIDLAND LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and STAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 392 (2nd April, 1998) 26725 bytes)

  198. ALFONSO DILIETO v. LONDON BOROUGH OF EALING [1998] EWHC Admin 389 (2nd April, 1998) 63894 bytes)

  199. ANDREW STEPHEN REID v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. ST ALBANS CITY AND DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 383 (1st April, 1998) 20319 bytes)

  200. EPSOM SKIP HIRE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 377 (31st March, 1998) 43013 bytes)

  201. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS EX PARTE ANTHONY MARSON, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 351 (23rd March, 1998) 47194 bytes)

  202. LEISURE G B PLC applicant/appellant v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND OTHER respondent [1998] EWHC Admin 337 (19th March, 1998) 24167 bytes)

  203. FLINTSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Ex Parte Somerfield Stores Ltd, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 336 (19th March, 1998) 83457 bytes)

  204. CHRISTOPHER HALL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1998] EWHC Admin 330 (18th March, 1998) 36365 bytes)

  205. BARNET BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ALFRED DAVID PHILIP (As personal representative of Shyamala Philip) [1998] EWHC Admin 328 (18th March, 1998) 23540 bytes)

  206. COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and SIMPSON [1998] EWHC Admin 324 (17th March, 1998) 29619 bytes)

  207. HOBCRAFT v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and WEALDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 323 (16th March, 1998) 23808 bytes)

  208. CARDIFF COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE SEARS GROUP PROPERTIES LIMITED, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 320 (13th March, 1998) 58828 bytes)

  209. JEFFREY PAUL ARMITAGE and JANE FRANCIS ARMITAGE v. SOUTH OXFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 315 (12th March, 1998) 33127 bytes)

  210. DAVID MERVYN JONES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT; and SAUNDERS [1998] EWHC Admin 310 (12th March, 1998) 42794 bytes)

  211. CASTLE COURT PREPARATORY SCHOOL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and EAST DORSET DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 308 (12th March, 1998) 34432 bytes)

  212. JULIAN MICHAEL WYATT DISTRICT SECRETARY and SOLICITOR OF TORRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. ANTHONY STEPHEN JARRAD [1998] EWHC Admin 301 (11th March, 1998) 34276 bytes)

  213. SNOWDONIA NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY v. NEIL JOHN GEORGESON [1998] EWHC Admin 283 (9th March, 1998) 16255 bytes)

  214. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and CHERWELL DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE BARONESS VON MALTZAHN, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 281 (9th March, 1998) 43089 bytes)

  215. BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL EX PARTE MOIRA ANDERSON, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 277 (9th March, 1998) 75603 bytes)

  216. BOULEVARD LAND LTD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND ANOTHER; [1998] EWHC Admin 243 (27th February, 1998) 55848 bytes)

  217. TORRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE ANDREW NEWBY, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 242 (26th February, 1998) 37370 bytes)

  218. WEST LANCASHIRE DC applicant v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and other respondent [1998] EWHC Admin 238 (25th February, 1998) 30061 bytes)

    Top of Page

  219. NORTH DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE GEOFFREY MICHAEL TARN ELIZABETH TARN;, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 216 (20th February, 1998) 54027 bytes)

  220. : TIMOTHY STEVENS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1998] EWHC Admin 190 (16th February, 1998) 67536 bytes)

  221. : QUEEN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT EX PARTE ROBERT D. BILLSON [1998] EWHC Admin 189 (16th February, 1998) 110132 bytes)

  222. BUDGENS STORES LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MILTON KEYNES CITY COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 186 (16th February, 1998) 38367 bytes)

  223. COWEN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY [1998] EWHC Admin 169 (12th February, 1998) 24412 bytes)

  224. AYLESBURY VALE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. JF SUMMERFIELD [1998] EWHC Admin 164 (11th February, 1998) 20723 bytes)

  225. NOURISH v. ADAMSON [1998] EWHC Admin 109 (29th January, 1998) 25023 bytes)

  226. EPPING FOREST BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE PHILCOX, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 100 (29th January, 1998) 19244 bytes)

  227. LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL EX PARTE BARRY RAMM, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 88 (28th January, 1998) 39309 bytes)

  228. BROADLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL ST MATTHEW SOCIETY LIMITED; PEDDARS WAY HOUSING ASSOCIATION; EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER ROBERT DOVE RICHARD WILLIAM HARPLEY; COLIN WRIGHT;, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 63 (26th January, 1998) 47436 bytes)

  229. BROADLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL ST MATTHEW SOCIETY LIMITED; PEDDARS WAY HOUSING ASSOCIATION; EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER ROBERT DOVE RICHARD WILLIAM HARPLEY; COLIN WRIGHT;, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 62 (26th January, 1998) 47436 bytes)

  230. REXWORTHY AND OTHERS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIROMENT and LEOMINISTER DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 59 (23rd January, 1998) 26101 bytes)

  231. JOSEPH HOLDER and SUSAN HANNAH HOLDE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and BARNET BOROUGH COUNCIL, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 56 (23rd January, 1998) 14231 bytes)

  232. CELIA ANN FIELD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and AMBER VALLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 53 (23rd January, 1998) 17015 bytes)

  233. CAERPHILLY COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE CAROLINE VEGA, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 50 (22nd January, 1998) 35133 bytes)

  234. BANNERTOWN DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL and KIMBERLEY SECURITIES PLC [1998] EWHC Admin 49 (22nd January, 1998) 57177 bytes)

  235. BARRY VICTOR LEO O'BRIEN v. HERTSMERE BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 35 (20th January, 1998) 32504 bytes)

  236. LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD EX PARTE P.A.J. BROWN, R v. [1998] EWHC Admin 29 (19th January, 1998) 22872 bytes)

  237. [1998] EWHC Admin 26 (19th January, 1998) 20949 bytes)

  238. [1998] EWHC Admin 25 (19th January, 1998) 19246 bytes)

  239. JOHN ERNEST MILLS and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND REGIONS and MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 17 (14th January, 1998) 77944 bytes)

  240. HM ATTORNEY GENERAL v. LOW [1998] EWHC Admin 15 (14th January, 1998) 25278 bytes)

  241. [1998] EWHC Admin 9 (13th January, 1998) 25174 bytes)

  242. HEVER GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL [1998] EWHC Admin 5 (12th January, 1998) 56126 bytes)

  243. WILSON AND FROGGATT v. SECRETARY AND STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 1175 (19th December, 1997) 37071 bytes)

  244. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. J BROWN [1997] EWHC Admin 1168 (19th December, 1997) 35967 bytes)

  245. BOLTON METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Ex parte ROGER ARTHUR KIRKMAN, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 1167 (19th December, 1997) 71783 bytes)

  246. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and LEEDS COUNTY COUNCIL ex parte Ramzan, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 1160 (18th December, 1997) 29217 bytes)

  247. METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF WIRRAL Ex parte ANITA JAYNE GRAY, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 1151 (17th December, 1997) 42650 bytes)

  248. MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF LONDON BOROUGH OF HAMMERSMITH and FULHAM v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. BURLINGTON FIVE LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 1135 (15th December, 1997) 26837 bytes)

  249. FRANCIS MORLAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT , TRANSPORT AND REGIONS v. SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1109 (10th December, 1997) 39000 bytes)

  250. JOHN DEREK WILLIAMS v. CHRISTINE MARGARET WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. BROMLEY LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1108 (9th December, 1997) 17311 bytes)

  251. JACKSON PROJECTS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. IPSWICH BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1107 (9th December, 1997) 45834 bytes)

  252. STRATFORD ON AVON DISTRICT COUNCIL (EX PARTE ALAN LANE), R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 1095 (4th December, 1997) 73120 bytes)

  253. ELMBRIDGE BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and WENDY FAIR LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 1078 (3rd December, 1997) 34375 bytes)

  254. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. REDLAND AGGREGATES LIMITED and NORWICH CITY COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1077 (2nd December, 1997) 32475 bytes)

  255. WESTERN AGGREGATES v. HEREFORD AND WORCESTER COUNTY COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1060 (28th November, 1997) 93944 bytes)

  256. TARMAC TOPBLOCK LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. NEW FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1059 (28th November, 1997) 17485 bytes)

  257. PALM DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. GILLINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 1057 (28th November, 1997) 63337 bytes)

  258. SOUTH GLAMORGAN COUNTY COUNCIL and WILLIAM CARROLL Ex parte HARDING, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 1053 (27th November, 1997) 75291 bytes)

  259. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAVERING v. NETWORK SITES LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 1015 (14th November, 1997) 22491 bytes)

  260. SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and DAWE [1997] EWHC Admin 1012 (13th November, 1997) 23591 bytes)

  261. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES v. RAILTRACK PLC [1997] EWHC Admin 1003 (11th November, 1997) 32105 bytes)

  262. POSTERMOBILE PLC v. LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT [1997] EWHC Admin 1002 (11th November, 1997) 55016 bytes)

  263. COLLIER-SALT v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES and CAERPHILLY BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 999 (11th November, 1997) 15847 bytes)

  264. DONLEY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and SOMERSET [1997] EWHC Admin 992 (10th November, 1997) 26196 bytes)

  265. ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA EX PARTE SIR EVELYN DE ROTHSCHILD, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 989 (7th November, 1997) 31246 bytes)

  266. BOMFORD LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and STRATFORD UPON AVON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 987 (7th November, 1997) 46970 bytes)

  267. ASHFIELD LAND LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and TORRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 986 (7th November, 1997) 30885 bytes)

  268. CHERWELL DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and FARRIES [1997] EWHC Admin 981 (6th November, 1997) 67712 bytes)

  269. A MORAN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. VALE OF WHITE HORSE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 968 (4th November, 1997) 44924 bytes)

  270. JOHN CLIFFORD EATSON v. PAMELA EATSON v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. SOUTH BEDFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 966 (3rd November, 1997) 48792 bytes)

  271. HOLLIS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and RUNNYMEDE BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 956 (31st October, 1997) 24371 bytes)

  272. GWYNEDD COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES and DOWSON [1997] EWHC Admin 954 (31st October, 1997) 43433 bytes)

  273. SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. J CLARKE [1997] EWHC Admin 940 (29th October, 1997) 64732 bytes)

  274. NEWBURY DISTRICT COUNCIL ex parte Blackwell, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 936 (29th October, 1997) 67716 bytes)

  275. ALNWICK DISTRICT COUNCIL ex parte ALAN ROBSON and KATHLEEN ROBSON, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 933 (29th October, 1997) 22744 bytes)

  276. LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. PATEL [1997] EWHC Admin 932 (28th October, 1997) 29173 bytes)

  277. CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE DYASON, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 926 (27th October, 1997) 45368 bytes)

  278. TIMOTHY JOHN PETER KNOWLES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. CHORLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 901 (20th October, 1997) 22739 bytes)

  279. NORTH-EAST LINCOLNSHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL (EX PARTE: BASS DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED), R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 898 (20th October, 1997) 122677 bytes)

  280. ARUN DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE MARIE-YVONNE FOWLER, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 896 (20th October, 1997) 31419 bytes)

  281. MALDON DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE ASHOK PATTANI, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 887 (16th October, 1997) 62132 bytes)

  282. VIRGIN CINEMA PROPERTIES LIMITED and OTHERS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and OTHERS [1997] EWHC Admin 857 (9th October, 1997) 57538 bytes)

  283. MARC JOHN GEALL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and LEWES DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 812 (17th September, 1997) 26078 bytes)

  284. [1997] EWHC Admin 805 (10th September, 1997) 21481 bytes)

  285. [1997] EWHC Admin 803 (9th September, 1997) 15091 bytes)

  286. IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 187B OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 222 OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 [1997] EWHC Admin 800 (5th September, 1997) 40271 bytes)

  287. MILLWOOD DESIGNER HOMES LIMITED and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ROTHER DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 794 (2nd September, 1997) 21748 bytes)

  288. DREXFINE HOLDINGS LIMITED AND CHERWELL DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 791 (29th August, 1997) 73704 bytes)

  289. [1997] EWHC Admin 775 (14th August, 1997) 62102 bytes)

  290. ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 769 (7th August, 1997) 68221 bytes)

  291. HERBERT AND OTHERS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES and NEWPORT COUNTY BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 767 (5th August, 1997) 47288 bytes)

  292. POWYS COUNTY COUNCIL v. HEW LOGAN KENNEDY [1997] EWHC Admin 763 (1st August, 1997) 18503 bytes)

  293. M J JAMES AND R J DAVIES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA [1997] EWHC Admin 762 (1st August, 1997) 46453 bytes)

  294. R and NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE COUNCIL ex parte HORTICULTURAL AND GARDEN PRODUCTS SALES (HUMBERSIDE) LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 751 (31st July, 1997) 43370 bytes)

  295. G KHAN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 742 (31st July, 1997) 35894 bytes)

  296. ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE TARMAC ROADSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 726 (29th July, 1997) 39063 bytes)

  297. SOUTH HAMS DISTRICT COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT; PETER J WHEELER and CATHERINE M WHEELER [1997] EWHC Admin 722 (28th July, 1997) 18446 bytes)

    Top of Page

  298. CHESTERFIELD PROPERTIES PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT; SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and STOCKTON-ON-TEES BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 709 (24th July, 1997) 108809 bytes)

  299. BEAULIEU PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 708 (24th July, 1997) 40444 bytes)

  300. REGASAMY BALAMOODY v. UNITED KINGDOM CENTRAL COUNCIL FOR NURSING, MIDWIFERY AND HEALTH VISITING [1997] EWHC Admin 704 (18th July, 1997) 23434 bytes)

  301. QUEEN v. WARWICK CROWN COURT Ex parte TREVOR WHITE [1997] EWHC Admin 670 (10th July, 1997) 34113 bytes)

  302. WILLIAM COOK ESTATES LIMITED v. NORTHERN LAND MANAGEMENT LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. REDCAR AND CLEVELAND BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SOMERFIELD STORES LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 608 (30th June, 1997) 54714 bytes)

  303. NEWBURY DISTRICT COUNCIL and NEWBURY AND DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ex parte CHIEVELEY PARISH COUNCIL, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 585 (23rd June, 1997) 114524 bytes)

  304. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT EX PARTE PHILIP JOHNSON and PHILIP BENN, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 569 (18th June, 1997) 22779 bytes)

  305. TENDRING DISTRICT COUNCIL Ex parte ROBERT LEONARD ESTATES LIMITED, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 558 (13th June, 1997) 90715 bytes)

  306. IN THE MATTER OF TOWN and COUNTRY PLANNING ACT S288 AND IN THE MATTER OF FILTON AIRFIELD, BRISTOL [1997] EWHC Admin 556 (13th June, 1997) 54235 bytes)

  307. SSE & SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE PANVERT and HILLS, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 554 (12th June, 1997) 28038 bytes)

  308. PF AHERN (LONDON) LIMITED and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and HAVERING BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 545 (10th June, 1997) 44527 bytes)

  309. LINDEN PRESCOTT DYASON v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and and CHILTERN DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 542 (10th June, 1997) 23325 bytes)

  310. JOHN FRANCIS PANVERT v. EMMA HILLS v. SECRETARY OF STATE OF ENVIRONMENT v. SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 507 (3rd June, 1997) 35469 bytes)

  311. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY EX PARTE WILLIAM NASH PLC, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 505 (23rd May, 1997) 32362 bytes)

  312. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT SOUTHEND-ON-SEA BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE MARDEN HOMES LIMITED, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 500 (22nd May, 1997) 26044 bytes)

  313. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT MILTON KEYNES BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE ANTHONY CHARLES ELLIOTT INCHBALD, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 499 (22nd May, 1997) 33743 bytes)

  314. JANINE COLLEY v. (l) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 497 (22nd May, 1997) 27490 bytes)

  315. TEESSIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION EX PARTE WILLIAM MORRISON SUPERMARKETS PLC and EX PARTE REDCAR AND CLEVELAND BOROUGH COUNCIL, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 481 (16th May, 1997) 108115 bytes)

  316. LONDON BOROUGH OF HAVERING v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. VICENZO PASSANANTE and GLORIA KAY PASSANANTE [1997] EWHC Admin 468 (14th May, 1997) 9484 bytes)

  317. ERIC T NORMAN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. NORTH WEST LEICESTERSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 466 (14th May, 1997) 40524 bytes)

  318. SAXONBEST LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY [1997] EWHC Admin 459 (12th May, 1997) 18406 bytes)

  319. LEEDS CITY COUNCIL EX PARTE KEVIN RODGERS ,; JOSEPH DORAN ,; GARY WAKEFIELD ,; FRED LEE , and ANTHONY SMITH, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 457 (12th May, 1997) 13906 bytes)

  320. Ex Parte Barker [1997] EWHC Admin 454 (9th May, 1997) 18448 bytes)

  321. EAST LINDSEY DISTRICT COUNCIL v. COOKSON [1997] EWHC Admin 447 (8th May, 1997) 24207 bytes)

  322. MS and DF BLAKE and SONS and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and COLCHESTER BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 438 (2nd May, 1997) 24498 bytes)

  323. INTERNATIONAL WIND DEVELOPMENT UK and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT COPELAND BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 432 (1st May, 1997) 34949 bytes)

  324. TIMOTHY FOYLE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. BASILDON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 424 (29th April, 1997) 32970 bytes)

  325. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and PENINSULAR PROTEINS LIMITED ex parte TORRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 415 (25th April, 1997) 53263 bytes)

  326. COTSWOLD DISTRICT COUNCIL AND OTHERS EX PARTE BARRINGTON PARISH COUNCIL, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 407 (24th April, 1997) 83722 bytes)

  327. SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL ARC SOUTHERN LIMITED ex parte RICHARD DIXON, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 393 (18th April, 1997) 46867 bytes)

  328. MAVIS ANN FOY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 332 (26th March, 1997) 18047 bytes)

  329. FULFORD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT RICHLONE LIMITED LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN [1997] EWHC Admin 329 (26th March, 1997) 57312 bytes)

  330. BERKELEY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 328 (26th March, 1997) 74147 bytes)

  331. AYRES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 327 (26th March, 1997) 34016 bytes)

  332. QUEEN v. NORTH SOMERSET DISTRICT COUNCIL PIONEER AGGREGATES (UK) LIMITED Ex parte AMANDA GARNETT and CHRISTOPHER PIERSSENE [1997] EWHC Admin 318 (24th March, 1997) 64226 bytes)

  333. MARTIN THOMAS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and and BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 314 (24th March, 1997) 25326 bytes)

  334. [1997] EWHC Admin 304 (21st March, 1997) 15172 bytes)

  335. IN THE MATTER OF A CASE STATED (SECTION 111 OF MAGISTRATES COURT ACT 1980) ALAN ENGLEHART CRESSWELL PARTICIA MARJORIE CRESSWELL v. MARTIN JOHN PEARSON [1997] EWHC Admin 299 (20th March, 1997) 27157 bytes)

  336. ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON and CHELSEA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT STARLEM PROPERTIES LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 284 (17th March, 1997) 19925 bytes)

  337. ICP DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT SALISBURY DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 278 (17th March, 1997) 65976 bytes)

  338. FORRESTETHE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and SOUTH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 271 (14th March, 1997) 33262 bytes)

  339. CADOGAN HOLDING COMPANY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA [1997] EWHC Admin 263 (13th March, 1997) 55033 bytes)

  340. WAKEFIELD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COUNCIL ex parte Pearl Assurance PLC, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 228 (5th March, 1997) 65544 bytes)

  341. TERENCE GEOFFREY BEST AND OTHERS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. BASS HOLDINGS LIMITED v. SOUTH SOMERSET DISTRICT COUNCIL v. TESCO STORES LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 226 (5th March, 1997) 103556 bytes)

  342. QUEEN v. BARRY VICTOR LEO O'BRIEN and HERTSMERE BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 210 (3rd March, 1997) 21917 bytes)

  343. ESCARGOT LTD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT MOLE VALLEY DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 207 (3rd March, 1997) 35087 bytes)

  344. ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA ex parte Lawrie Plantation Services, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 199 (28th February, 1997) 40956 bytes)

  345. RALLS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1997] EWHC Admin 198 (28th February, 1997) 20795 bytes)

  346. BYRNE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ARUN [1997] EWHC Admin 190 (27th February, 1997) 35855 bytes)

  347. [1997] EWHC Admin 151 (17th February, 1997) 25550 bytes)

  348. HART DISTRICT COUNCIL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ROWEN PROPERTIES (LONDON) LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 141 (14th February, 1997) 65883 bytes)

  349. DAWN SMITH v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT CRAVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 97 (3rd February, 1997) 27824 bytes)

  350. DAVID PAUL WILKINS v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOR WALES VALE OF GLAMORGAN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 96 (3rd February, 1997) 16690 bytes)

  351. LONDON BOROUGH OF MERTON and NEWMONT PROPERTIES LIMITED PLC EX PARTE DOROTHY DRIVER, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 43 (21st January, 1997) 57840 bytes)

  352. SOUTH GLAMORGAN COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE STANLEY PHILIP HARDING, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 37 (20th January, 1997) 67520 bytes)

  353. MEACOCK v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND-UPON-THAMES v. BG PLC [1997] EWHC Admin 29 (19th January, 1997) 44021 bytes)

  354. DAVID MERVYN JONES and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and and SAUNDERS [1997] EWHC Admin 25 (17th January, 1997) 33394 bytes)

  355. QUEEN v. LEOMINSTER DISTRICT COUNCIL Ex parte PATRICIA POTHECARY [1997] EWHC Admin 24 (16th January, 1997) 35260 bytes)

  356. NETWORK SITES LIMITED EX PARTE LONDON BOROUGH OF HAVERING, R v. [1997] EWHC Admin 14 (15th January, 1997) 33026 bytes)

  357. INOCO PLC v. WYRE FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 9 (14th January, 1997) 48193 bytes)

  358. RW RAMSEY and JP RAMSEY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL [1997] EWHC Admin 2 (10th January, 1997) 44253 bytes)

  359. LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. WATES LEISURE LIMITED [1997] EWHC Admin 1 (10th January, 1997) 40522 bytes)

  360. BOROUGH OF SANDWELL and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and; BLACK COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and and GAZELEY PROPERTIES LTD [1996] EWHC Admin 378 (18th December, 1996) 60192 bytes)

  361. GARNESECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON and CHELSEA, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 354 (12th December, 1996) 31275 bytes)

  362. BASSETLAW DISTRICT COUNCIL EX PARTE GRAHAM ANTHONY NICHOLAS OXBY, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 344 (11th December, 1996) 29138 bytes)

  363. SWAYFIELDS LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT NORTH WEST LEICESTERSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL HALLAM LAND MANAGEMENT LIMITED [1996] EWHC Admin 343 (10th December, 1996) 64177 bytes)

  364. QUEEN and WEST DORSET DISTRICT COUNCIL ex parte CATHERINE SEARLE [1996] EWHC Admin 341 (10th December, 1996) 57452 bytes)

  365. LEKH RAJ BIRDY and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT [1996] EWHC Admin 338 (10th December, 1996) 12383 bytes)

    Top of Page

  366. TSB BANK PLC v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1996] EWHC Admin 321 (4th December, 1996) 27689 bytes)

  367. JEREMY DAVID HARTNELL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and HERTSMERE BOROUGH COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 293 (28th November, 1996) 56192 bytes)

  368. MARK and LUCIA SHEPHERD and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and THREE RIVERS DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 273 (26th November, 1996) 23546 bytes)

  369. SWAN v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT; RHYS EVANS; BARRY GEORGE EVANS and RHIAN ELIZABETH MARILYN JONES [1996] EWHC Admin 266 (22nd November, 1996) 18541 bytes)

  370. SCOTT v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 264 (22nd November, 1996) 32172 bytes)

  371. RAMBRIDGE v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and EAST HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 262 (22nd November, 1996) 28690 bytes)

  372. COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE EX PARTE KAY & CO, ASSOCIATION OF OPTOMETRISTS, COLAINGROVE LTD, GREENLEE GROUP PLC, RAYNER and KEELER, NATIONAL PROVIDENT INSTITUTION, ALLIED DOMECQ PLC, WARDENS OF COMMONALITY OF MYSTERY OF MERCERS OF CITY OF LONDON, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 245 (19th November, 1996) 141045 bytes)

  373. CHARLOTTE GOODWIN v. STRATFORD-UPON-AVON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 241 (18th November, 1996) 48511 bytes)

  374. SPENCER BENJAMIN HEDGES and HEATHER MARIA HEDGES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 240 (15th November, 1996) 48236 bytes)

  375. SPENCER BENJAMIN HEDGES and HEATHER MARIA HEDGES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 239 (15th November, 1996) 48210 bytes)

  376. MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT RINGWAY INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED [1996] EWHC Admin 220 (12th November, 1996) 114946 bytes)

  377. R v. NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE BROWN [1996] EWHC Admin 203 (6th November, 1996) 78917 bytes)

  378. BRANT HOMES CENTRAL LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 197 (6th November, 1996) 34632 bytes)

  379. HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND MONUMENTS COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT [1996] EWHC Admin 191 (5th November, 1996) 51284 bytes)

  380. LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET v. NETWORK SITES LIMITED [1996] EWHC Admin 188 (4th November, 1996) 16039 bytes)

  381. IN THE MATTER OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 SECTION 288 AND IN THE MATTER OF LAND AT RICHMOND PARK, SANDWAYS, CALSTOCK, CORNWALL A. AND J.K. KNOTT v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and CARADON DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 181 (1st November, 1996) 50454 bytes)

  382. Kyte and Others and Secretary of State for the Environment Shepway District Council and Rank Holidays and Hotels Development Limited [1996] EWHC Admin 160 (28th October, 1996) 56159 bytes)

  383. [1996] EWHC Admin 156 (28th October, 1996) 34289 bytes)

  384. PARLIAMENTARY COMMISSIONER FOR ADMINISTRATION EX PARTE MAURICE AND AUDREY BALCHIN, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 152 (25th October, 1996) 64406 bytes)

  385. [1996] EWHC Admin 146 (25th October, 1996) 35608 bytes)

  386. LISA BRITTON AND ANOTHESECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 143 (24th October, 1996) 93152 bytes)

  387. TAMESIDE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and ROLAND BARDSLEY (BUILDERS) LIMITED [1996] EWHC Admin 135 (21st October, 1996) 59579 bytes)

  388. CLOWES DEVELOPMENTS LTD v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and NORTH WEST LEICESTERSHIRE DC [1996] EWHC Admin 126 (18th October, 1996) 17044 bytes)

  389. STOCKS HOTEL AND COUNTRY CLUB v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and DACORUM BOROUGH COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 125 (17th October, 1996) 30107 bytes)

  390. SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL v. WILLIAM ANTHONY BAKEPAUL GOODYEAR, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 119 (16th October, 1996) 17654 bytes)

  391. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT EX PARTE WAKEFIELD METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 118 (16th October, 1996) 42627 bytes)

  392. LONDON BOROUGH OF BARKING AND DAGENHAM v. MILLS and ALLEN LIMITED [1996] EWHC Admin 109 (14th October, 1996) 24266 bytes)

  393. HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH BOROUGH COUNCIL EX PARTE FL FITCHETT AND JS BLOOR (SERVICES) LIMITED, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 107 (14th October, 1996) 46277 bytes)

  394. SISSON COX HOMES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and PETERBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 104 (11th October, 1996) 17382 bytes)

  395. CITY PARK PROPERTIES v. JOHN WILLIAM McGREGOR [1996] EWHC Admin 99 (10th October, 1996) 14024 bytes)

  396. NEWPORT BOROUGH COUNCIL v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES v. HEXAPOINT LIMITED (TRADING AS HEIGHTS 2000) [1996] EWHC Admin 93 (8th October, 1996) 43199 bytes)

  397. MARGARET BETTY LOPEZ DE CARRIZOSA and EVELYN ROSEMARY BURTON and PATRICIA DANN and MARTIN ROBERT EAYRS v. HUNTINGDONSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 81 (3rd October, 1996) 30723 bytes)

  398. ANTHONY LYNDON JONES v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES and VALE OF GLAMORGAN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 80 (3rd October, 1996) 27924 bytes)

  399. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. CROWN ESTATE COMMISSIONERS v. EAST COAST SHIPPING AGGREGATES LIMITED EX PARTE DAVID BRYANT, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 53 (30th July, 1996)

  400. SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS TRIBUNAL and CAMBRIDGESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL EX PARTE CHAPMAN, R v. [1996] EWHC Admin 48 (24th July, 1996)

  401. WILSON BOWDEN PROPERTIES LIMITED and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT and NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 40 (17th July, 1996)

  402. MOBIL OIL COMPANY LIMITED v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT; WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL and SAFEWAY STORES PLC [1996] EWHC Admin 23 (9th July, 1996)

  403. Ex Parte THAMESDOWN BOROUGH COUNCIL [1996] EWHC Admin 5 (21st February, 1996) 24198 bytes)

  404. ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON and CHELSEA v. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT v. PIER LUIGI MOLINARO [1996] EWHC Admin 1 (10th January, 1996) 41626 bytes)

Top of Page CfPS HOME PAGE

THIS CAMPAIGN IS FUNDED FROM YOUR DONATIONS - PLEASE GIVE GENEROUSLY

FUNDRAISING SECTION